The key difference between an influential, insurrectionary minority and a vanguard or a populist group is that the former values its principles and its horizontal relations with society and tries to spread its principles and models without owning them, whereas a vanguard tries to control them—whether through force, charisma, or hiding its true objectives—while a populist group offers easy solutions and caters to the prejudices of the masses in fear of being isolated. The populist group never actually overcomes isolation, as that would require forming strong relations that can abide a difference of opinion. Instead, it simply mimics the mass.
Because they both seek the warmth of the herd, the vanguard and the populist often become bedfellows, as the Stalinists and the UGT did during the Spanish Civil War. Within this partnership, the former will be more effective and will make use of the latter.
The influential minority, meanwhile, is prone to developing an antisocial tendency—as its idealism contrasts with the unprincipled pragmatism of the majority—and becoming accustomed to the role of gadfly. If this tendency manifests as a disdain for the rest of society and a commitment to realizing its principles despite and against the masses, it is likely to find common ground with vanguardist groups, who will probably use it as shock troops for carrying out offensives—as in the October Revolution. If, on the other hand, it takes the easier antisocial path of abstracting its principles, it will limit its influence, because nothing around it will reflect its ideals or invite its engagement. Only when they constantly relate their principles to the complexity of their surroundings can such minorities serve as a model for others to become actors in their own right.
The influential minority works through resonance, not through control. It assumes risks to create inspiring models and new possibilities, and to criticize convenient lies. It enjoys no intrinsic superiority and falling back on the assumption of such will lead to its isolation and irrelevance. If its creations or criticisms do not inspire people, it will have no influence. Its purpose is not to win followers, but to create social gifts that other people can freely use.
I am providing and improving this list of writings by Alfredo Maria Bonanno in the interest of charting the progression of that comrades anti-political progression over time. Of interest perhaps is his foundation in a very classic view early on regarding minority struggle and self-management. His later pieces get more diverse and start to focus more and more on the insurrectional struggle as well as developments in capitalism, jail time, and other various topics.
-Sabotage
Revolution, Violence, Anti-authoritarianism: A few notes - 1974, 1977, 1984
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/revolution-violence-anti.html
A Critique of Syndicalist Methods - 1975
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/critique-of-syndicalist-methods.html
Workers’ Autonomy - 1975, 1976
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/workers-autonomy.html
Anarchism and the National Liberation Struggle - 1976
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/anarchism-and-national-liberation.html
Why a Vanguard? - 1977
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-vanguard.html
Fictional Movement or Real Movement? - 1977
http://pantagruel-provocazione.blogspot.com/2011/06/fictitious-movement-and-real-movement.html
Looking Foward Towards Self-Management -1977
http://pantagruel-provocazione.blogspot.com/2010/07/looking-forward-to-self-management.html
Armed Joy - 1977
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/armed-joy.html
From Riot to Insurrection - 1985
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/from-riot-to-insurrection.html
Propulsive Utopia - 1987/1988
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/propulsive-utopia.html
A Few Notes on Sacco and Vanzetti (From Revolutionary Solidarity) - 1989
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/search/label/Revolutionary%20Solidarity
Dissonances - (Late 80s early 90s)
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/dissonances.html
Let’s Destroy Work, Let’s Destroy the Economy - (Late 80s to mid 90s)
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/lets-destroy-work-lets-destroy-economy.html
The Anarchist Tension - 1996
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/anarchist-tension.html
Locked Up - 1997
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/locked-up.html
Apart from the Obvious Exceptions - 1997, 2000
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/apart-from-obvious-exceptions.html
Insurectionalist Anarchism - 1999
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/insurrectionalist-anarchism-part-one.html
The Insurrectional Project - 2000
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/insurrectional-project.html
Palestine, mon amour - (Various Dates)
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/2010/08/palestine-mon-amour.html
Some Writings of Alfredo Maria Bonanno in English
An essay from a member of Black Wave Communist Collective that was shared on Recomposition as part of a series on work and sleep.
Even My Dreams These Days Have Work-Related Scenes
by Lou Rinaldi
I
I’m stuck there in a chair in my kitchen. It’s like I can’t move, I guess I really can’t explain it, but I’m looking up at the clock (wait, I don’t have a clock!) and the time changes nearly every minute to something completely different. I’m starting to feel nauseous and disoriented. And then – there it is! The right minute. I’m allowed to go now. I can get up and I leave my apartment and hop onto the bus. It’s strange to me because I don’t remember the bus going right to my apartment before. Oh well, I don’t really have think of how absurd this is because of the overwhelming feeling of dread and nervousness I have looming over me. You see, I’m three hours late for work!
I finally arrive and it’s packed. I work at a restaurant and it’s the busiest night of the week, I promptly get a scolding from each of my coworkers and the manager. I forgot my work clothes, but there are some that fit me just right in the dish room (strange, they have my pants and everything), so I hurry to change. As I punch in I see them all staring at me with a glare that sees right through me – they know I’m afraid. For some reason, they went into three sections before I arrived – they’ve put section two, the largest, aside for me. The customers have been waiting there for hours to eat, waiting for me.
I get out my pad and pen and go up to the first party, there are two tables put together so that ten people could sit together. All of the other tables and booths are packed. I introduce myself with my usual line:
“Hey everyone, how’re we? I’m Lou and I’ll be taking care of you tonight. Our soups are–” I don’t know the soups. Red faced, I scurry over to check. I continue, “clam chowder, beef stew, and french onion. Could I start you off with some drinks and an appetizer?” All ten of them look at me, glaring, and finally one says bluntly, “we’re all set to order.” A give a anxious smile. “Go right ahead.” They start to go around with the usual stuff. It’s a burger cooked medium on rye with fries. A hot dog and relish with coleslaw. Oh no! Each of them tells me the order but I can’t remember it, even as I try to write it down, it slips from memory and I am stuck asking over and over again for them to repeat the order. Each time I only pick up fragments. This is only the first table and my section is full – shit! I move on even though I don’t have the order, the thought goes through my head that I’ll just piece it together when I need to.
This gets repeated at every table I go to. I notice now that the rest of the restaurant is emptied out. I have a full section and the other servers are just sitting around because they don’t have any customers. I’m swamped and about to sink so I ask my coworkers for help, but they shake their heads. My manager comes up to me and tells me I have to go into the basement to stock paper products and it has to be done this very minute! I try to explain I’m busy, but he insists, so I head downstairs. The basement is completely different than what it looks like. It’s a huge warehouse with rows and rows for supplies and it extends so far that I can’t even see the other wall. Nothing is labeled and I start getting really nervous! I haven’t put all my food orders in and besides I mostly just guessed at what they wanted! I start running around like a nut looking for what I need until I run into my manager. He starts screaming at me about everything I’m doing wrong and I’m getting more and more angry. I snap, or something, because before I know it I’ve pushed him to the ground and I’m beating him to a pulp, before I know it the guys dead.
II
I’ve been having this dream or other dreams like it for several years now. When I was younger, at my other jobs, I never really had dreams about work, but now I’ve been working at the same restaurant for three years and it is a regular occurrence. I picked this one to describe, because it’s the most extreme one I’ve had. It makes me look a bit nuts and now no one will want to fuck with me probably, because I’m clearly crazy as hell. But seriously, it’s after dreams about work I seriously question the legitimacy of my work. Why is this?
Speaking from my experience, I’ve never had a positive dream involving work. I’m always being scolded or attacked in my work-related dreams. They’re always fantastical, unrealistic, exaggerated, but based in them is a kernel of truth. My subconscious is taking the very real alienation I feel at work every day and running with it. The result, often, is a very bad nights sleep and this scares me. I commute on the bus to work, all and all my commute takes 40 minutes, one way. I consider that to be a part of my work-time, in that it cuts into my reproduction as a worker. Now entire nights are essentially disrupted – I’m doing work in my sleep and I don’t even get paid. A whole new aspect of the theft of my reproduction has just come into my life.
These dreams don’t just exaggerate my own alienation, they take many truths from the real social relations in restaurants – they exemplify why restaurants are so difficult to organize. Despite the fact that we’re a “team” there isn’t really anything unifying about the different sections of a restaurant, or even the coworkers in one part of the house. The servers bitterly compete for shifts and tables. A long-term clique gets the best shifts – I’ve been working there three years and I still can’t become part of the day crew, or become first-in on Fridays or Saturdays. We go to the takeout and ice cream area only to find the counterperson making up an excuse as to why they can’t help you make the twelve sundaes your need. The dishwasher brings up dirty silverware. It’s hard to build past these inconveniences, especially as a server, who relies on being quick, outgoing, and having everything ready for them in order make a livelihood. Bringing out dirty silverware to a customer is embarrassing and they can take note of these things when tipping.
So many of us rely on tips we see the customer as the enemy more than the manager, even though so often we are set up to fail by the boss. Maybe I realized that in my dream and took it to the only logical conclusion I could make in that setting?
I’m not really that surprised, because even if I wasn’t a convinced communist I figure I’d still feel the same off the clock. Work is exhausting, not always physically (though sometimes), it takes a mental toll. Especially in a position where you a “server” – there’s an implied relationship there that, given the way we’re sometimes treated by customers (never mind the boss), is difficult to go back in face day after day. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve got more bills to pay, and that means more time at work. At my worst, I feel so bad that I’ll stay in bed all day until I have to get up to go to work. On a good day, it seems I still don’t have enough time to be productive for my own means and feel fulfilled.
This post is part of a series of stories on work, sleep, and dreams. Lou is the one who originally came up with the idea for this series – thanks Lou. He’s a member of Common Struggle Libertarian Communist Federation and writes a blog of his own.
A new radical radio show from Hartford, CT. An interview with the National Secretary of Common Struggle - Libertarian Communist Federation and member of Black Wave Communist Collective. News about the political work being done by Black Wave and other locals of Common Struggle, specifically about the General Strike on May First.
Chris Hedges Welcoming Committee in Providence
by Red Zarathustra
Wednesday April 11th, Chris Hedges gave a lecture at Brown University.
The topics included civil liberties, state repression, and the
so-called “liberal class” and its demise. In light of the recent
article describing black bloc tactics as the “cancer” of the Occupy
movement, a number of Providence anarchists attended the talk.
Throughout his talk these comrades stood up and one by one adorned
black attire and bandanas. Hedges noted, “it seems we have some Black
Bloc Anarchists [sic] here, either that or some people are very cold.”
The point of this action was not to intimidate Hedges or the largely
old, white liberal audience, but to show them just how wrong their
analysis of black bloc is. That there are, in fact, faces behind the
masks – normal proletarians – who are willing to engage in discussion
on tactics. The questions and answers section reflected this, even
though the hosts of the event attempted to deny the anarchists the
right to speak.
Hedges made it quite obvious what his opinion on discussion and
challenging his own ideas are. Simply put, he openly told of his
frustration of going to general assemblies only to encounter chants of
“diversity of tactics” rather than tactical discussion. It was
apparently because of this that he felt there was absolutely no
discussion needed then. He himself merely needed to chant
“non-violence” and the matter was settled. No discussion, no desire
for discussion.
His arrogant handling of critique was perhaps a side-note to his
prescribed vaccine to the pathologized black bloc. He purported that
we must acknowledge the police are the 99%, that we must not taunt or
harass the police, nor must we be bold and take actions that could
potentially cause repression. This struck me wrong two-fold. First,
it misunderstands solidarity. It implies that solidarity has
terms, that it is only given when actions meets a check-list and there is no room for autonomy. What this does, leading into my second point, is
disenfranchises significant portions of the 99% – namely people of
color. It enforces what the late Joel Olson called the White
Democracy. Put succinctly by Olson, “When people of color have to
enter a movement on white people’s terms rather than their own, that
is not the 99%. That’s white democracy.”*
At Brown University, Hedges gave an apocalyptic view of the past and
present conditions of resistance to capitalism. Given this and his
inability to have a constructive discussion with the very people he
wishes to call a “cancer” (some of whom have been the backbone of
resistance in the past 20 years!) it becomes more and more obvious
that he stands in the camp of the bourgeoisie. Hedges and others like
him are the same people who would put his enemies against the wall if
he somehow inherited state power. Though he denies being a dogmatic
pacifist he also believes that the black bloc is morally wrong, that
physical resistance to american imperialism should only occur when it
is a minute before midnight and it is seemingly too late. If the
movement was made up solely of people like Chris Hedges we’d be dead
and gone by now.
We hope Chirs Hedges enjoyed his stay in Providence and his welcoming committee at the lecture.
*Whiteness and the 99% by Joel Olson.
…wrote this piece about the different myths going around about May Day and the General Strike.
“Art is no longer for its own sake; we are being taught by a capitalist university to succeed in a capitalist society.”
(Source: imthefuckingdj)
74 notes (via selfactivity & imthefuckingdj)
Insurrectionary anarchism
English:
http://actforfree.nostate.net/
http://waronsociety.noblogs.org/
http://continwar.noblogs.org/
http://thisisourjob.noblogs.org/
http://anarchistnews.org/
http://guerrillanews.wordpress.com/
http://325.nostate.net/
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/topics/insurrectionist.html
http://reocities.com/kk_abacus/
http://vastminority.blogspot.com/
http://feartosleep.blogspot.com/
http://pantagruel-provocazione.blogspot.com/
http://digitalelephant.blogspot.com/
Spanish:
http://liberaciontotal.lahaine.org/
http://vivalaanarquia.espivblogs.net/
http://materialanarquista.espiv.net/
http://hommodolars.org/
http://rojoscuro.blogspot.com/
http://amotinadxs.blogspot.com/
http://feartosleep.blogspot.com/
http://contrainformate.blogspot.com/
http://marginadxs.blogspot.com/
http://metiendoruido.com/
In english:
http://ourwar.org/
http://santiaskoanarquista.noblogs.org/
Italian:
http://culmine.noblogs.org/
http://finimondo.org/
http://iconoclasta.noblogs.org/
http://parolearmate.noblogs.org/
http://anarchaos.org/
http://chiusoperrapina.noblogs.org/
http://informa-azione.info/
http://edizionianarchismo.net/
http://macheteaa.org/
http://novatore.it/
In english:
https://sites.google.com/site/anarchyinitaly/
http://pantagruel-provocazione.blogspot.com/
http://renzonovatore.blogspot.com/
http://machetea.blogspot.com/
Greek:
http://rioter.info/
http://anarchypress.gr/
http://hitnrunner.blogspot.com/
http://bellumperpetuum.blogspot.com/
http://directactiongr.blogspot.com/
http://metatatrikala.blogspot.com/
http://blognonserviam.wordpress.com/
http://aixmi.wordpress.com/
http://pernongrata.wordpress.com/
http://halastor.blogspot.com/
http://a-politiko.espivblogs.net/
http://exnegativo.blogspot.com/
http://anarcores.blogspot.com/
French:
http://non-fides.fr/
http://suieetcendres.blogspot.com/
http://sabotagemedia.anarkhia.org/
http://cettesemaine.free.fr/spip/
https://juralib.noblogs.org/
http://cestdejatoutdesuite.noblogs.org/
http://journalhorsservice.blogspot.com/
http://lesliquidateursduvieuxmonde.wordpress.com/
http://pagheretetutto.blogspot.com/
In english:
http://polisson.blogsport.de/
http://stormheaven.wordpress.com/
http://acorpsperdu.wikidot.com/
German:
https://directactionde.ucrony.net/
http://unruhen.org/
http://unruhen.blogspot.com/
http://unruhen.wordpress.com/
http://revolte.blogsport.eu/
http://directactionde.blogspot.com/
http://anarchistische-aktion-zentralschweiz.over-blog.de/
http://andiewaisendesexistierenden.noblogs.org/
http://tearsandangergreece.blogsport.de/
http://noprisonnostate.blogsport.de/
http://abc-berlin.net/
In english:
https://directactionde.ucrony.net/en
Dutch:
http://rookenas.blogspot.com
http://oohv.wordpress.com/
http://krantbuitendienst.blogspot.com/
Russian:
http://blackblocg.info/
Croatian:
http://infoshopiskra.blogspot.com/
http://ispodplocnika.net/
Czech:
http://jailbreaking.noblogs.org/
Finnish:
http://takku.net/
Swedish:
http://dvm.webblogg.se/
http://kampenmotdetexisterande.forvilda.se/
http://batko.se/
Portuguese:
http://fogogrego.noblogs.org/
http://abordaxerevista.blogspot.com/
Turkish:
http://internationala.org/
http://isyananarsi.blogcu.com/
http://yasar.us/
http://karaisyan.blogspot.com/
http://yasamaevet.noblogs.org/
http://uyusmazlar.blogspot.com/
http://sokaktabirhayalet.blogspot.com/
Indonesian:
http://negasi-negasi.blogspot.com/
http://memorisenja.blogspot.com/
http://kokemi.blogspot.com/
http://kontinum.org/
http://timkatalis.blogspot.com/
http://uncivilized-uncivilizedimagination.blogspot.com/
In english:
http://hidupbiasa.blogspot.com/
“I want to talk a little bit about extremism in American politics today… I’m not entirely against it.”
The picture above is Dr. Joel Olson, author of The Abolition of White Democracy, speaking in December 2010 in Sedona, Arizona, giving a lecture entitled Extremism and American Politics: Abolitionists, Jihadis, and Tea Parties.
Joel has been on sabbatical from his position at Northern Arizona University, working on his next book (American Zealot: Fanaticism and Democracy in the United States), teaching classes at the University of Alicante in Spain, and was most recently vacationing in Nottingham, UK. Word started getting around last night that Joel passed away yesterday. I’m not sure of any of the details and I’d guess that very few know right now. I was only informed because I read it on the social network status updates of mine and Joel’s mutual friends.
Joel was not a mentor to me. We were not close friends. I know that he was a wonderful husband and father, a beloved professor, and role model for the activist community. But I can only claim an acquaintance at best. Here’s the thing - Joel was such a kind, intelligent, passionate person who contributed so much to this world, that even my tenuous connection to him still makes this loss devestating. If I feel the impact, I can only imagine how deeper that feeling runs for those close to Joel, those for whom he has played pivotal roles in their lives.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Joel was an editor for the zine Hippycore, from which the influential vegan cookbook Soy Not Oi was spun off. When he moved to Minneapolis for graduate school, he became an editor of the legendary zine Profane Existence and a member of the collective behind the publication. He was also a drummer with some P.E. comrades in a band called Pissed that was supposed to tour Europe with seminal crust band Doom. The performances didn’t happen, but Joel was along for the ride anyway.
Having returned to the state where he was born, Joel founded Phoenix Copwatch, a grassroots movement for civilian monitoring of police to keep them accountable, in 1998. This is about the time I first met Joel, and my memory of him from then is how I always remember him, even as I followed his exploits for the next fifteen years. In my mind, he was always the friendly anarchist dude I used to run into at punk shows. He was that guy who passed around a newsletter called Bring the Ruckus that I just didn’t understand. For me, before Cornel West, before Peggy McIntosh, before Tim Wise, before social justice activism blogs on Tumblr, there was Joel. He was talking about something called “white privilege” that I just couldn’t wrap my head around at that time in my life.
Joel got married, started a family, wrote and got published more, and moved up in the ranks of academia, eventually becoming Associate Professor at NAU’s Department of Politics and International Affairs. But he never gave up the struggle against oppression and never shirked from the responsibilities he took on as an ally of oppressed people. If you look at his home page, you can see all the work he has continued doing against racism and the destructive social construct known as “whiteness,” including his actions to protest the anti-Latino/anti-Latina/anti-immigrant Arizona Senate Bill 1070.
I used to think I was a smart guy. I used to think it was enough that I wasn’t a racist. As you get older, you learn a lot and you realize how little you actually know, how much you missed out on over the years. I look back at everything Joel has done and everything he was saying when I met him that didn’t click then, but rings so true now. It’s not enough to merely refrain from slurs or hateful thoughts. That deserves no cookie, no pat on the back, no pass from communities of color. We do not live in a post-racial society. White people still benefit from undue privilege and need to become more aware of how the system works, how race actually functions. My understanding of these issues are now leaps and bounds beyond when I met Joel, but it was him planting the seed, and it was his writings and speeches, that helped these ideas germinate for me.
As his path took him to Flagstaff, AZ and mine took me to Los Angeles, I stayed connected to Joel through social network sites. One day, he solicited feedback on the first couple chapters of his new book, asking friends to submit their emails if they were interested. I am honored to have been one of the folks he was comfortable sending his writing to and I regret not responding to thank him for that. You just take for granted that people are going to be around and you’ll catch up with them later. I’m too late for that now, but I’m thankful for the small interaction I had with Joel and envious of those who got to know him on a more personal level.
This morning, I pulled up Joel’s email, addressed to me and others. Joel signed off on that email, “Yours for freedom fanatically, Joel.” Joel was a writer. A zinester. An activist. A teacher. He was one of ours. And we are all together in this. At least, Joel saw that we could be.
“Revolutionaries don’t make revolutions. Millions of ordinary and oppressed people do.”
Thank you, Joel, for inspiring us to be better people by being one of the best.
10 notes (via hellfireandredredcommunism & brodiefosterhubbard)
So, for anyone trying to claim Adrienne Rich was just a product of her times in regards to her hatred of trans women, I dug up a blog post from Daisy’s Dead Air from a few years years ago, in which she gives Andrea Dworkin’s views of trans people in a book published in 1974. Things to note: the third point is descriptive, not prescriptive, and alludes to the obviously very different experiences of everyone in a world without gender; this was written in 1974 (five years before Janice Raymond’s
hate-filled rantbook), and terminology used reflects that; and that abolition of gender does not signify the end of all expression that is currently gendered, or the end of all bodily alterations, but rather the end of the division of labor and society, and exclusion and domination of people who have certain sets of traits that are currently gendered.
Anyway, to quote Daisy:In conversations with trans feminists, I have continually assured them that many Second-Wave radical feminists were NOT transphobic, and actually empathetic to trans people. However, I’ve had trouble finding any proof, other than my own memory and a few trans friends of Kate Millett’s. Depressingly, the more I searched, I found much more proof that radical feminists were mean and vicious (i.e. Robin Morgan’s lynch-mob rhetoric concerning trans women in her book titled Going Too Far). The Janice Raymond/Robin Morgan/Mary Daly faction seems to have “won” the transgender round of radical feminist theory, by default.
And so, it brings me great pleasure, after a very long search, to finally have the following quote IN MY HAND, not just from memory. Thank God for Amazon.com and the used books option, since this is long out of print.So, no, it’s not that “everyone was in a sea of transphobia” or “all radical feminists were intensely transphobic”, and it’s not like Rich held some transphobic views and perhaps wrote some transphobic statements in letters, but never spent energy furthering the hatred and exclusion of trans women; she helped put together a manuscript, and encouraged it, and was a source for ideas in it, that has been a blueprint for the exclusion of trans women from feminist movement and shelters, clinics, and other resources. And not every thinker in her tradition held those views, because Andrea Dworkin and Kate Millett were both hugely important.
The points:
1) No one is saying to throw out everything Adrienne Rich did; we’re saying that her other work needs to be examined in the context of the work she actively took that has resulted in suffering and exclusion.
2) No one is perfect, but the degree to which flawed ideas shaped a person’s work and how actively they carried out views we rightly regard as hateful and/or reactionary needs to be considered; on this, Adrienne Rich did far more than just have hateful views of trans women.
3) There is never just one set of ideas that people have, that everyone is forced to hold; yes, there are dominant ideas, but there are also radical ideas, arising out of the material conditions of the dominated, exploited, and excluded’s lives, and it is the duty of any “radical” thinker to not just accept the dominant ideas - which are always the ideas of the dominators, exploiters, and excluders - but to rather critically consider the ideas they are surrounded with and not let their blindspots blossom into themselves carrying out the processes of dominance, exploitation, and exclusion.